|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nomad I
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
0
   |
Posted - 2011.10.04 07:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
Elise DarkStar wrote:The "back to school" bump has been muted due to generally falling numbers from incarna.
Tech and derivatives have been dominated by stockpiles being cashed in. Nano stockpiles may have run out, whereas fullerides and straight tech have not yet done so.
I doubt that. Nanos are dominated by reaction towers and many low sec POS owners switched to something else for 4 week ago, when the price for nanos crashed. The last 2 weeks were dominated by a shortage because of less POS reactions. This is repeating now. |
Nomad I
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
61
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 07:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
The point is, when is game is going to be devaluated because of missing fun, CCP will do something about that. And when CCP's system isn't ready, they will do something stupid to solve the situation fast.
I don't see a reason why should there be a roof for tech ? It's CCP's fault to provide a limited ressource to a raising player amount. For reaction POS owners with a high liquidity it's good news, because their concurrents can't pay the next tech batch for the towers. I believe tech is going up to 300k in the mid term.
Don't complain about Goons. They do what everyone with a little bit capitalistic instinct had done. And yes, the military power of Goons will be superior, because they can afford it and others can't. Economical power translates into military power. And as everyone of you could read on EVENews,. they initiated a program for Tengus. They allready have programs for supercarrier and Titans. Well done Mittani. |
Nomad I
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 06:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
I examined the amount of traded tech in Jita and the trend is clear. The actual traded amount of tech is 20% lower than in the best times. (10day avg) The cartel is working until now, but stockpiling is ongoing. I examined the traded amount of nanotranistors too and even this went down. Actually since the price went up to 10k ISK the amount of traded nanotransistors went rapidly down as well as the tech.
There are maybe 3 causes for this:
1) The high prices on T1 minerals is lowering the demand for T2 too
2) The high price on tech is lowering the demand for T2
3) The high price on tech isn't for many reaction pos owners affordable. They haven't the liquidity
What do you think?
|
Nomad I
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 22:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
The amount of sold tech per day is lowering. The level for a 10d avg is at 750k per day. Nanotransistors have a better future. The total size of all buy orders is much greater than the total size of all sell orders and the amount of traded Nanotransistors is raising.
That is good news for Tech moon owners. |
Nomad I
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 07:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
It doesn't matter where the tech is processed. In the end it's the total market value that gives you the profit. And when nanotransistors don't give an noticeable additional profit because of the tower and transport cost, moon goo owners will not do it. |
Nomad I
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
66
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 08:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:It's a standoff between buyers accepting the new price and sellers maintaining it. Theoretically it's easier for the smaller number of sellers to collude to fix the price, and so far they've managed to stay firm.
However, there is a lot of pressure building up in raw tech, and while time is on the side of the cartel, it does constantly wear away at their collusion. Buyers will eventually accept the new price, if the cartel doesn't crack first.
I have noticed somebody coming by to clear out the sells below 200k pu, so if you're a primary producer who needs quick cash, just list at 199999.99 instead of selling to a buy order, and whomever is keeping the price nice and tidy will scoop it up from you.
Confirmed. Some sellers doing their bussiness not at the OTEC conditions. If this continues, the OTEC will be soon history. |
Nomad I
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
67
|
Posted - 2012.05.19 08:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:SetrakDark wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:like most t2 stuff is hilariously underpriced now the shock just keeps slowly rippling through and we're going to see a sudden shortage of t2 stuff in a little while That's exactly it. People all down the line say "**** it, I'm not paying for that", but they eventually will, at least at ~200k pu. Just a matter of who cracks first, buyers or sellers. Interesting times. it's actually making me consider just going **** it and reacting the stuff all the way down the line, so our attempts to jack the price don't get muffled by reactors
It's looking like the goons are getting f****** by one of the opponents. The price for Nanotransistors is at a level paying just the fuel costs. So even when you process the stuff self, the prices are down. I curious how long does it take before a crash sends tech to 160k |
Nomad I
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 07:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Go, go, gadget technetium to 250k ! 
Oh, look at this! Akita is going to be a bad goon copy. |
|
|
| |
|